Template:Admin Page Status/doc: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
* This template is hidden using `<div style="display:none;">`. | * This template is hidden using `<div style="display:none;">`. | ||
* All values are stored as Semantic MediaWiki properties for querying and reporting. | * All values are stored as Semantic MediaWiki properties for querying and reporting. | ||
== See Also == | |||
* [[Module:CalibrationCycle]] | |||
* [[Template:Admin Page Status]] | |||
'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.''' | '''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.''' | ||
Revision as of 04:30, 11 July 2026
Welcome to the MoA–TSG Lab. The wiki is the bench. The work is Metrology of the Abstract. Adopt the tools or leave them on the rack — either way, the need doesn't wait.
- Lab Note: A redlink is not a failure. It identifies Calibration Debt—work waiting to be measured, mapped, and calibrated.
|
CYCLE Calibration position Status — Rough Draft
This page is a conceptual instrument under Permanent Beta. It declares a real calibration position, not a finished product waiting to ship. Checking continues; an edit is only required when evidence demands it. Stage: Seed to Fruit. Feedback welcome — especially clarity, failure modes, and calibration gaps. Use discussion or Contribute. |
Meta
Admin Page Status/doc
| Type | Meta & Framework |
|---|---|
| Functional Layer | Documentation & Maintenance |
| Application Layer | Framework Infrastructure |
| Category | Meta & Framework |
| Version | 0.2 |
| Maturity | Developing |
| Last Calibration | 2026-07-11 |
| Status | Permanent Beta |
| Description | Field guide and reference for the
template. Explains the purpose, options, and reasoning behind each field used to track page calibration and maintenance. |
Menu
Core Principles
- Reality gets final vote
- See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.
- Permanent Beta
Navigation
Related
Admin Page Status: Field Guide
This page documents the {{Admin Page Status}} template — its parameters, how to use it, and the reasoning behind each field. It is intended for anyone performing a calibration review or maintenance pass on a page.
Rough draft note: This is a first pass at explaining the reasoning behind each field. It will be expanded with links to the specific framework pages (Reference Standards, Reality Override Game, etc.) that each field draws its logic from, once those cross-references are added.
Description
This template tracks the maintenance and calibration status of pages within The Sovereign Games project. It stores structured data using Semantic MediaWiki properties and is completely hidden on the rendered page.
It is intended for admin and maintainer use only.
How to Use This Page
When reviewing a page, work through each field in the Field-by-Field Guide section below, in order. For select-type fields, only use the listed options — do not invent new values, as this breaks the semantic queries and dashboards that depend on consistent values. If a field genuinely doesn't apply to a given page, use "Not applicable" or "Not checked" rather than leaving it blank where those options exist; a blank field and a deliberately-assessed "not applicable" mean different things to anyone reviewing the dashboard later.
Usage
To use this template, add the following at the very bottom of a page:
{{Admin Page Status
<!-- Do Not Remove commented out Reference Options -->
<!-- === CORE STATUS === -->
<!-- options: Done, Needs review, Not started -->
| categorization =
<!-- options: Self-Assessment, Confirmed Rating -->
| calibration_review =
<!-- options: Development, Stable, Mature -->
| instrument_grade =
<!-- options: Low, Moderate, High -->
| validation =
<!-- === REVIEW METADATA === -->
<!-- Format: YYYY-MM-DD -->
| review_date =
| reviewed_by =
<!-- === CYCLE & PRIORITY === -->
<!-- options: Core, Supporting, Peripheral -->
| priority =
<!-- Days before considered overdue (default: 90) -->
| review_threshold =
<!-- === STRUCTURAL / NAVIGATIONAL === -->
<!-- options: Yes, No, Not checked -->
| has_backlinks =
<!-- options: Yes, Has red links, Not checked -->
| outbound_links_valid =
<!-- options: Yes, No -->
| in_outline =
<!-- options: Yes, No -->
| in_category_outline =
<!-- === TEMPLATES & FORMATTING === -->
<!-- options: Done, Needs review, Not started -->
| templates_complete =
<!-- options: Meets standard, Needs work, Not checked -->
| formatting_standard =
<!-- === CONTENT INTEGRITY === -->
<!-- options: Applied, Not applicable, Needs work -->
| symmetry_check =
<!-- options: Yes, No, Not applicable -->
| self_report_flagged =
<!-- options: Yes, Needs work, Not checked -->
| terminology_consistent =
<!-- === PROCESS / DEPENDENCY === -->
<!-- options: Confirmed by other party, Self-assessed only -->
| standing_check =
<!-- options: None open, Open, Disputed -->
| drift_report_status =
<!-- Semi-colon separated list of pages this page depends on -->
| depends_on =
<!-- Semi-colon separated list of pages that depend on this page -->
| cited_by =
}}
```
Quick-Reference Parameter Tables
Core Status
| Field | Type | Options |
|---|---|---|
| categorization | select | Done, Needs review, Not started |
| calibration_review | select | Self-Assessment, Confirmed Rating |
| instrument_grade | select | Development, Stable, Mature |
| validation | select | Low, Moderate, High |
Review Metadata
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| review_date | date | Last review date in YYYY-MM-DD format |
| reviewed_by | text | Username of the person who performed the review |
Cycle & Priority
| Field | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| priority | select | Core, Supporting, Peripheral |
| review_threshold | number | Days before a review is considered overdue (default: 90) |
Structural / Navigational
| Field | Type | Options |
|---|---|---|
| has_backlinks | select | Yes, No, Not checked |
| outbound_links_valid | select | Yes, Has red links, Not checked |
| in_outline | select | Yes, No |
| in_category_outline | select | Yes, No |
Templates & Formatting
| Field | Type | Options |
|---|---|---|
| templates_complete | select | Done, Needs review, Not started |
| formatting_standard | select | Meets standard, Needs work, Not checked |
Content Integrity
| Field | Type | Options |
|---|---|---|
| symmetry_check | select | Applied, Not applicable, Needs work |
| self_report_flagged | select | Yes, No, Not applicable |
| terminology_consistent | select | Yes, Needs work, Not checked |
Process / Dependency
| Field | Type | Options / Description |
|---|---|---|
| standing_check | select | Confirmed by other party, Self-assessed only |
| drift_report_status | select | None open, Open, Disputed |
| depends_on | text | Semi-colon separated list of pages this page depends on |
| cited_by | text | Semi-colon separated list of pages that depend on this page (inbound) — see note below, not intended to be manually filled |
Field-by-Field Guide
Core Status
categorization
What it measures: Whether the page has been placed into the correct category structure for its type and content (Core Diagnostic, Calibration Procedures, Practical Application, etc.). How to judge it:
- Done — page sits in the category (or categories) that correctly reflect its content and type.
- Needs review — page is categorized, but the categorization may be wrong, outdated, or incomplete (e.g. content evolved past its original category).
- Not started — page has no meaningful categorization yet.
calibration_review
What it measures: Whether the page's content and its other Admin Page Status fields have been reviewed only by the original author, or independently confirmed by someone else. How to judge it:
- Self-Assessment — the author rated the page themselves. This is a legitimate first state, not a failure — but it should not be treated as carrying the same authority as a Confirmed Rating.
- Confirmed Rating — a second party, who was not the primary author, reviewed the page's content and ratings and confirmed, adjusted, or disputed them.
Why this field exists: A standard rated only by its own author is vulnerable to the same conflict of interest as any self-graded work — the author has an interest in the standard they built being seen as sound. This field makes that distinction visible rather than hiding it.
instrument_grade
What it measures: How far along the page is in its own lifecycle as a usable tool — separate from whether it's "correct." How to judge it:
- Development — actively being built or revised; not yet reliable to lean on.
- Stable — the core content and structure have settled; small refinements still possible, but the page won't fundamentally change shape.
- Mature — extensively used, tested against real application, and unlikely to need structural revision (though still open to Permanent Beta correction if reality contradicts it).
validation
What it measures: How much real-world testing or evidence stands behind the page's claims, independent of how well-reasoned it sounds. How to judge it:
- Low — reasoned from first principles or a single case; not yet tested against multiple real situations.
- Moderate — applied and checked in a handful of real cases; some evidence, not exhaustive.
- High — applied and confirmed across many independent cases, ideally including cases the author didn't build the page around.
Common mistake: Confusing internal coherence with validation. A page can be perfectly logical and still be Low validation if it hasn't been tested against reality yet.
Review Metadata
review_date
Format: YYYY-MM-DD The date of the most recent substantive review of this page — not the page's creation date, and not a trivial edit (typo fix, formatting). This date drives the automatic Cycle Status calculation.
reviewed_by
Format: Username Who performed the review reflected in `review_date`. If `calibration_review` is set to "Confirmed Rating," this should be the confirming party, not the original author.
Cycle & Priority
priority
What it measures: How central this page is to the framework — used to sort the maintenance dashboard so the most important stale pages surface first, rather than everything sorting purely by date. How to judge it:
- Core — foundational pages other pages depend on (e.g. Reality Override Game, Reference Standards, Hidden Mastery hub pages).
- Supporting — pages that apply or extend core concepts but aren't themselves load-bearing for the rest of the framework.
- Peripheral — standalone or illustrative content; if this page went stale, little else would be affected.
review_threshold
Format: Number (days). Default: 90 if left blank. How many days can pass before this page is considered Overdue. Core pages may warrant a shorter threshold (e.g. 30–60 days); Peripheral pages can reasonably use a longer one (e.g. 180).
Structural / Navigational
has_backlinks
Whether other pages actually link to this page. A page can be well-written and still be effectively invisible if nothing points to it. Check via "What links here" on the page's tools menu.
outbound_links_valid
Whether this page's own `links` point to pages that actually exist, or to red links (pages that don't exist yet, often from naming inconsistencies — e.g. "Whack-a-Mole" vs. "Whack-A-Mole").
in_outline
Whether this page is included in its own logical outline or table-of-contents structure.
in_category_outline
Whether this page is properly linked from its relevant category page(s).
Templates & Formatting
templates_complete
Whether all expected supporting templates for this page type are present and filled in.
formatting_standard
Whether the page's structure, headers, and formatting conventions match the established house style.
Content Integrity
symmetry_check
For any page that compares or evaluates multiple sides: was diagnostic inversion actually applied with matched rigor?
self_report_flagged
Whether the page makes claims resting only on self-report, and whether that limitation is explicitly stated.
terminology_consistent
Whether terms and naming are consistent with the rest of the framework.
Process / Dependency
standing_check
Whether the ratings on this page (particularly `calibration_review` and `validation`) have been confirmed by someone other than the original author.
drift_report_status
Whether anyone has filed a Drift Report against this page (a claim that its content has drifted from observable reality or needs recalibration), and if so, whether it's still unresolved (Open) or actively contested between the reporter and the author/reviewer (Disputed).
depends_on
Format: Semi-colon separated list of page names Other pages this page's claims or structure rely on.
cited_by
Note: This field is not intended to be manually filled in. It should be generated automatically by querying other pages’ `depends_on` fields. Treat manual entries here as temporary placeholders.
Notes
- This template is hidden using `
- All values are stored as Semantic MediaWiki properties for querying and reporting.
See Also
See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.
This page remains in Permanent Beta and will be expanded with cross-references as related framework pages are finalized.