Category talk:Calibrated Terms
Latest comment: 25 July by Sovereign in topic Calibration Report — Submit a Term — 2026-07-25 (Development / Invitation page)
Page Transparency & Calibration
- Calibration Log & Decision Records (via Talk Page) — This page uses Talk-only calibration tracking. Full history of reviews, version changes, calibration decisions, and any governance reasoning behind structural decisions all live on the same Talk page, per Calibration Log: When to Create One and Decision Records: Governance Memory. Not every Calibration Log entry is a Decision Record — scan the Talk page's headings for entries specifically marked as decisions; the link itself being active only confirms this page has calibration history, not that a formal decision was ever recorded.
- View Current Page History — Complete edit history.
This page is under continuous calibration in line with the Permanent Beta principle.
Public Discussion Welcome
Questions, suggestions, feedback, disagreement, and proposed improvements are welcome on the Talk page.
Light rules:
- Prefer evidence and concrete examples over slogans.
- Apply Diagnostic Inversion Test when criticizing — the same standard to this page that you would apply elsewhere.
- Distinguish observation from conclusion.
- Calibration entries and Decision Records are maintenance records; public discussion belongs in ordinary Talk threads.
- This framework remains in Permanent Beta. Better calibration is always in scope.
Calibration Report — Submit a Term — 2026-07-25 (Development / Invitation page)
| Calibration event | |
|---|---|
| Page | Category:Calibrated Terms |
| Date | 2026-07-25 |
| Report type / tier | Development (first invitation page for term proposals) |
| Calibration objective | Create a low-friction, high-transparency invitation for new terms while locking the standing rules and multi-instrument requirement so the invitation cannot dilute Phase 0 discipline. |
| Reviewer | William (human primary); Grok (structural + content support) |
| Method | Direct construction from project standing rules + TDP-001 requirements + Page Structure Calibration Checklist |
| Standing (this report) | Self-Assessment |
| Standing impact | No standing change |
| Evidence basis | TDP-001 standing ladder; existing CR-FAIR-001; Phase 0 focus; checklist |
Summary: Invitation page created under Category:Calibrated Terms. It opens a clear path for term proposals while making Self-Assessed status, multi-instrument work, and the ban on standing inflation explicit. Ratings held at Experimental. Drift set to Breadcrumb-Open.
Actions performed
- Created invitation page with explicit process and non-negotiable rules.
- Forced Experimental / Self-Assessed / Low validation.
- Linked to TDP-001 and CR-FAIR-001.
- Placed in Category:Calibrated Terms.
- Added failure modes against the main risks (definition-pushing and standing inflation).
Open Items
- Confirm live category existence.
- Decide exact submission channel (Talk page vs dedicated candidate pages) once volume appears.
- Keep Phase 0 execution (independent re-runs, library index) higher priority than expanding invitations.
What this report does NOT claim
- The invitation does not accelerate standing of any record.
- Volume of submissions is not guaranteed.
- AI support does not create Confirmed standing.
See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better. Sovereign (talk) 07:47, 25 July 2026 (EDT)