Jump to content

Talk:Capability Development Roadmap: Difference between revisions

From The Sovereign Games (MoA Lab)
Latest comment: 23 July by Sovereign in topic Calibration report
 
m {{Standalone Transparency}}
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Standalone Transparency}}
== Calibration report ==
== Calibration report ==



Latest revision as of 15:07, 23 July 2026

Page Transparency & Calibration

This page is under continuous calibration in line with the Permanent Beta principle.


Public Discussion Welcome

Questions, suggestions, feedback, disagreement, and proposed improvements are welcome on the Talk page.

Light rules:

  • Prefer evidence and concrete examples over slogans.
  • Apply Diagnostic Inversion Test when criticizing — the same standard to this page that you would apply elsewhere.
  • Distinguish observation from conclusion.
  • Calibration entries and Decision Records are maintenance records; public discussion belongs in ordinary Talk threads.
  • This framework remains in Permanent Beta. Better calibration is always in scope.

Calibration report

2026-07-23 | v0.1 | Self-Assessment | Capability Development Roadmap

Checked: Structure against page pre-cal rules (no Active Development notice; static date; footer ×1; visible Resource; Open Items ↔ drift not “None open”; Experimental grade).

Assumed: User “freeze” = landmark freeze for citation/steering, not exit from infancy or Permanent Beta.

Apple seed: Explicit infancy rules — seed not graded as orchard; mess ≠ unlabeled drift; phase-appropriate evaluation.

Nonconformances addressed in draft: Roadmap gaming unnamed → boundary section; Phase 4/6 underspecified outward/Tier-A contact → exit criteria tightened; “freeze” vs Permanent Beta → freeze note under Status.

Readiness gap: This page does not make the project Operational. It orients. instrument_grade Experimental is required by documented state.

Standing of report: Self-Assessed. No independent confirmation. Sovereign (talk) 15:06, 23 July 2026 (EDT)Reply