Calibration Report Standard Format - Revision history

Sovereign: Calibration Report | 2026-07-24 | v0.5-dev | Self-Assessment | Calibration Report Standard Format Merge: event header table + method/standing split + objective/impact/evidence basis; formal pre-cal and confirmation tiers; conditional omit. Not a second standard page. Dates unchanged.

2026-07-24T12:54:51Z

Calibration Report | 2026-07-24 | v0.5-dev | Self-Assessment | Calibration Report Standard Format Merge: event header table + method/standing split + objective/impact/evidence basis; formal pre-cal and confirmation tiers; conditional omit. Not a second standard page. Dates unchanged.

Show changes

Sovereign: /* What Disqualifies an Entry From Being Official */ added - == Calibration Procedure Types == '''Note: naming and defining these three calibration types is itself a structural addition to this page, not a content calibration of the subject matter this page documents — logged as a pre-cal-tier edit, `review_date`/`Last Calibration` unaffected.'''

2026-07-20T21:25:19Z

What Disqualifies an Entry From Being Official: added - == Calibration Procedure Types == '''Note: naming and defining these three calibration types is itself a structural addition to this page, not a content calibration of the subject matter this page documents — logged as a pre-cal-tier edit, `review_date`/`Last Calibration` unaffected.'''

@@ Line 118: / Line 118: @@
 * A paired edit summary (or vice versa)
 * Direct editing of a previous report instead of adding a new dated entry
 == Relationship to Other Standards ==

Sovereign: /* Relationship to Other Standards */ '''Development Breadcrumb — Structural Pre-Cal Tier Not Yet Formalized (2026-07-20):''' Calibration Report Standard Format does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals — a legitimate, high-frequency, already-active workflow that intentionally does not evaluate content quality, instrument_grade upgrades, or conceptual soundness — currently soft-violate a few Core re

2026-07-20T14:32:07Z

Relationship to Other Standards: '''Development Breadcrumb — Structural Pre-Cal Tier Not Yet Formalized (2026-07-20):''' Calibration Report Standard Format does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals — a legitimate, high-frequency, already-active workflow that intentionally does not evaluate content quality, instrument_grade upgrades, or conceptual soundness — currently soft-violate a few Core re

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:32, 20 July 2026
Line 122:		Line 122:
	This page defines the '''shape''' and minimum content of individual Calibration Reports and their paired edit summaries. It does not define when a report is required (see [[Decision Records: Governance Memory]]) or where reports should be stored (see [[Calibration Log: When to Create One]]).		This page defines the '''shape''' and minimum content of individual Calibration Reports and their paired edit summaries. It does not define when a report is required (see [[Decision Records: Governance Memory]]) or where reports should be stored (see [[Calibration Log: When to Create One]]).

	'''~~Open Item~~ — Structural Pre-Cal ~~tier~~:'''		'''Development Breadcrumb — Structural Pre-Cal Tier Not Yet Formalized (2026-07-20):''' [[Calibration Report Standard Format]] does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals — a legitimate, high-frequency, already-active workflow that intentionally does not evaluate content quality, instrument_grade upgrades, or conceptual soundness — currently soft-violate a few Core requirements of this standard, most notably the always-present Open Items section and Edit Summary language written for full content-style reports. '''This is a known incompleteness in the standard, not a failure of the pre-cal practice.''' Resolving condition: a scoped amendment adding a first-class '''Structural Pre-Cal''' report tier — heading annotation, an explicit "content not calibrated" statement, Open Items permitted to read "None (structural only)," and lighter paired Edit Summary language appropriate to structural-only work. Until that amendment lands, structural pre-cal reports should be understood as intentionally lighter than this page's Core requirements imply, not as reports failing to meet the standard.
	~~This page~~ does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals ~~are~~ already in active ~~use~~ and ~~are legitimate~~. ~~The~~ standard ~~needs~~ a scoped amendment ~~defining~~ a ~~lighter required set for them (~~heading annotation, explicit ~~“content~~ not ~~calibrated”~~ statement, ~~adjusted~~ Open Items / Edit Summary ~~expectations)~~. Until that amendment ~~is made~~, structural pre-~~cals will soft-violate a few~~ Core requirements ~~of this page. This is a known incompleteness in the standard~~, not ~~a failure of~~ the ~~practice~~.

	'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''		'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''

Sovereign: /* Relationship to Other Standards */ '''Open Item — Structural Pre-Cal tier:''' This page does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals are already in active use and are legitimate. The standard needs a scoped amendment defining a lighter required set for them (heading annotation, explicit “content not calibrated” statement, adjusted Open Items / Edit Summary expectations). Until that amendment is made,

2026-07-20T14:24:05Z

Relationship to Other Standards: '''Open Item — Structural Pre-Cal tier:''' This page does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals are already in active use and are legitimate. The standard needs a scoped amendment defining a lighter required set for them (heading annotation, explicit “content not calibrated” statement, adjusted Open Items / Edit Summary expectations). Until that amendment is made,

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:24, 20 July 2026
Line 121:		Line 121:
	== Relationship to Other Standards ==		== Relationship to Other Standards ==
	This page defines the '''shape''' and minimum content of individual Calibration Reports and their paired edit summaries. It does not define when a report is required (see [[Decision Records: Governance Memory]]) or where reports should be stored (see [[Calibration Log: When to Create One]]).		This page defines the '''shape''' and minimum content of individual Calibration Reports and their paired edit summaries. It does not define when a report is required (see [[Decision Records: Governance Memory]]) or where reports should be stored (see [[Calibration Log: When to Create One]]).

			'''Open Item — Structural Pre-Cal tier:'''
			This page does not yet explicitly distinguish structural pre-calibration reports from content/governance calibration reports. Structural pre-cals are already in active use and are legitimate. The standard needs a scoped amendment defining a lighter required set for them (heading annotation, explicit “content not calibrated” statement, adjusted Open Items / Edit Summary expectations). Until that amendment is made, structural pre-cals will soft-violate a few Core requirements of this page. This is a known incompleteness in the standard, not a failure of the practice.

	'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''		'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''

Sovereign: Structural pre-cal only. Fixed GameModule placement, canonical param name, replaced forbidden live dates, added inline option comments, corrected template order. Nonconformances logged first. Content calibration still pending.

2026-07-20T14:11:38Z

Structural pre-cal only. Fixed GameModule placement, canonical param name, replaced forbidden live dates, added inline option comments, corrected template order. Nonconformances logged first. Content calibration still pending.

Show changes

Sovereign at 14:27, 19 July 2026

2026-07-19T14:27:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 19 July 2026
Line 140:		Line 140:
	'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''		'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''

			{{Standalone Transparency}}
	{{RelatedPages}}		{{RelatedPages}}
	~~{{Standalone Transparency}}~~
	~~{{Calibration Maintenance}}~~
	{{Calibration Dependent}}		{{Calibration Dependent}}
	{{Calibration Dependencies Display}}		{{Calibration Dependencies Display}}
			{{Calibration Maintenance}}
			{{Framework Reference}}
			{{Calibration Procedure Reference}}
			{{Tracking Logs Reference}}

	[[Category:Meta & Framework]]		[[Category:Meta & Framework]]

Sovereign: /* Relationship to Other Standards */ Accidently removed - put it back. {{Standalone Transparency}}

2026-07-18T14:40:09Z

Relationship to Other Standards: Accidently removed - put it back. {{Standalone Transparency}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 18 July 2026
Line 141:		Line 141:

	{{RelatedPages}}		{{RelatedPages}}
			{{Standalone Transparency}}
	{{Calibration Maintenance}}		{{Calibration Maintenance}}
	{{Calibration Dependent}}		{{Calibration Dependent}}

Sovereign: /* Example Section Headers (Situational Vocabulary) */ Calibration Report Standard Format — Clarified that Example Section Headers are suggestions, not requirements. Added short intro statement and a few additional useful headers.

2026-07-18T14:38:43Z

Example Section Headers (Situational Vocabulary): Calibration Report Standard Format — Clarified that Example Section Headers are suggestions, not requirements. Added short intro statement and a few additional useful headers.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 18 July 2026
Line 107:		Line 107:
	== Example Section Headers (Situational Vocabulary) ==		== Example Section Headers (Situational Vocabulary) ==

	The ~~following~~ headers are ~~available for use when a report~~'~~s content warrants~~ them. ~~They~~ are not ~~mandatory on~~ every report:		The headers below are '''suggestions''', not requirements. They represent useful section titles that have emerged from real calibration reports across this project. Use them when they genuinely improve clarity. You are not expected to include all (or even most) of them in every report.

	* Summary of Changes (Core)		* '''Summary of Changes''' (Core)
	* Process Note		* '''Process Note'''
	* instrument_grade: [Old] → [New]		* '''instrument_grade: [Old] → [New]'''
	* Validation: [Old] → [New]		* '''Validation: [Old] → [New]'''
	* The Full Arc, Summarized		* '''Fields Changed'''
	* What Each Reviewer Contributed		* '''The Full Arc, Summarized'''
	* Why This Decision Is Trusted		* '''What Each Reviewer Contributed'''
	* Meta-Finding, Worth Recording		* '''Why This Decision Is Trusted'''
	* ~~Fields Changed~~		* '''Meta-Finding, Worth Recording'''
	* Open Items (Core)		* '''Open Items''' (Core)
	* What This Report Does NOT Claim (Contextual)		* '''What This Report Does NOT Claim''' (Contextual)

	== What Disqualifies an Entry From Being Official ==		== What Disqualifies an Entry From Being Official ==

Sovereign: /* Tiered Required Elements */

2026-07-18T14:35:15Z

Tiered Required Elements

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 18 July 2026
Line 51:		Line 51:
	Not every report requires the same depth. The following tiered structure applies:		Not every report requires the same depth. The following tiered structure applies:

	~~###~~ Core Elements (Always Required)		'''Core Elements (Always Required)'''
	These must be present in every Calibration Report:		These must be present in every Calibration Report:

Line 64:		Line 64:
	* Closing line: `'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''`		* Closing line: `'''See the Game. Refuse the Game. Build Better.'''`

	~~###~~ Contextual Elements (Required on Significant Reports)		'''Contextual Elements (Required on Significant Reports)'''
	These are required when the report involves material status changes or governance decisions:		These are required when the report involves material status changes or governance decisions:

Line 71:		Line 71:
	* '''AI-Reviewer Attribution''' — Required when AI assistance was used in the review process.		* '''AI-Reviewer Attribution''' — Required when AI assistance was used in the review process.

	~~###~~ Recommended Elements		'''Recommended Elements'''
	These are strongly encouraged but not mandatory on minor reports:		These are strongly encouraged but not mandatory on minor reports:

Sovereign: /* Heading Standard */

2026-07-18T14:34:08Z

Heading Standard

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 18 July 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:

	A Calibration Report heading must contain, in this order:		A Calibration Report heading must contain, in this order:
	- The literal phrase '''"Calibration Report"'''		*The literal phrase '''"Calibration Report"'''
	- The exact page name (as a searchable substring)		*The exact page name (as a searchable substring)
	- The date in `YYYY-MM-DD` format		*The date in `YYYY-MM-DD` format

	An optional short annotation may be added in parentheses at the end (e.g., Structural Freeze, Minor Correction, Round-Robin Convergence).		An optional short annotation may be added in parentheses at the end (e.g., Structural Freeze, Minor Correction, Round-Robin Convergence).

	'''Examples of valid headings:'''		'''Examples of valid headings:'''
	- `== Calibration Report — Slave Owner Game/Effects — 2026-07-14 ==`		*`== Calibration Report — Slave Owner Game/Effects — 2026-07-14 ==`
	- `== Calibration Report — Slave Owner Game/Effects — 2026-07-14 (Structural Freeze) ==`		*`== Calibration Report — Slave Owner Game/Effects — 2026-07-14 (Structural Freeze) ==`
	- `== Calibration Report — Calibration Report Standard Format — 2026-07-18 (Tiering Update) ==`		*`== Calibration Report — Calibration Report Standard Format — 2026-07-18 (Tiering Update) ==`

	The purpose of this standard is reliable searchability and chronological clarity, not strict punctuation enforcement.		The purpose of this standard is reliable searchability and chronological clarity, not strict punctuation enforcement.